Scott Chesson
Integrity Matters
I read the outcome of the Theranos trial with great interest. Theranos is yet another high-profile example of fraud and deception. Elizabeth Holmes, CEO of Theranos, was convicted on four counts of fraud. Fiduciary responsibility was violated repeatedly over a long period.
Experienced investors poured $1.4 billion in capital into the company based on what was supposed to be an ingenious device that reliably and accurately tested for a wide assortment of conditions based on a few drops of blood.
In hindsight, there were a variety of red flags that should have given investors pause. One red flag was the absence of a Chief Financial Officer (CFO) for most of the time that Theranos was in business. Theranos had a CFO for only eight months out of fifteen years. The CFO was let go by Holmes after expressing concern that Theranos faked test results.
It isn’t easy to comprehend how a business receiving $1.4 billion in funding was without a CFO for most of its existence. The CFO is expected to be the truth-teller, the reality check to balance out unfettered optimism, the enforcer of financial and operational discipline, and the conscience of the business. In the absence of a CFO, Theranos’ finances became utterly disconnected from reality and the company’s external facade.
The financial fiction reached a crescendo in 2014 when Theranos issued a projection claiming $1 billion in revenue in 2015, even though its revenue in 2014 was around $100,000 and its contracts were shrinking rather than expanding.
Integrity matters significantly in life and business. We must trust the people we work with closely inside and outside our company. Fraud in any form is deplorable and serves to chip away at our faith in those charged with fiduciary responsibility.
Thus, when your business needs a full-time or part-time finance chief, take a long, hard look at the character and trustworthiness of your candidates. Your CFO must have impeccable integrity to oversee your business’ finances and tell you the truth about your company.
Every business owner will exit their business at some point – whether voluntarily or involuntarily – yet only about 50% of business owners have a buy-sell agreement in place to govern the terms and process of the exit. For this reason, it’s crucial to know about buy-sell agreements, which are legally binding contracts between co-owners of a business that determines the actions if a co-owner chooses or is forced to depart a company and the process of purchasing that person's share. I’ve compiled a list of the most commonly asked questions about buy-sells: How would a business owner benefit from a buy-sell agreement? In many cases, the business owner's largest and most significant asset is the business itself. Suppose something happened to one of the primary owners. In that situation, it is crucial to ask how the owner’s demise or departure would affect the lifestyle and exit plans of the other owners, the business, and the other interested parties. Are you willing to share your business with your deceased partner's heir? The demise of a primary owner is an excellent example of where buy-sell agreements come into play. They can remove the speculation regarding the future of your business. Furthermore, a buy-sell can reduce the stress and turmoil of an emotional situation. Do you need a business valuation when implementing a buy-sell agreement? The short answer is yes. A business valuation can be critical when contemplating a buy-sell. Valuations help you understand your business's worth and determine your action path after a buy-sell is activated due to a triggering event, such as when a primary business owner becomes disabled, leaves the company, or passes away. Suppose a buy-sell agreement does not require an updated company valuation after a triggering event. In that case, the surviving owner may be required to pay the amount stated in the original buy-sell, even if that amount no longer accurately reflects the company's actual worth. Similarly, a company's valuation may differ after a primary owner leaves the business. As you can see, knowing how much your company's value depends on its current organizational structure and staying ahead of the game in your forecasting is essential. Who does a business owner work with to implement a buy-sell agreement? A Certified Valuation Analyst is a professional business valuator who, along with a trusted attorney, is a must-have in establishing a proper buy-sell agreement. Because buy-sell arrangements can be challenging to discuss with a business partner and require much organization and implementation, a trusted attorney can steer and mediate those difficult conversations. Protect your business – and yourself – by being prepared for the difficult transition when an owner exits the business. Buy-sell agreements help pave the way for smoother transitions.
I’ve seen so much in my twenty-five years as a CFO, and though I’ve worked in many sectors, the area where I’ve observed the most financial pitfalls has been for small businesses. I want to share two of my most common observations so that you can avoid making the same mistakes if you’re currently in any of these situations as a business owner. All you need is a bit of flexibility, foresight, and innovation. 1) Impulsive Cost Cutting Measures The knee-jerk reaction for most folks in challenging economic times is a tendency to focus on cutting costs while losing sight of how important it is to optimize and innovate your revenue streams. I’m not saying that cost reduction isn’t essential, or even mandatory, during an economic downturn. Still, I will stress that reducing your costs cannot replace a concerted strategy to optimize your existing revenue streams while also exploring and building new revenue pathways. Perhaps a tactic you may want to consider is scrubbing your costs throughout the year rather than doing so dramatically during a moment of panic. It allows you to be more thoughtful in your approach. I’d also suggest you look at zero-based budgeting, which means annual expense budgets are not automatically renewed with a blanket percentage increase and, instead, each expense category is analyzed and justified based on a company’s requirements -- in concert with the overall cost structure. Even implementing zero-based budgeting on a limited basis will help avoid protracted cost-cutting during downturns. My final advice on this matter is to not be too hard on yourself! It’s easy to lose sight of growing the top line when your business is fighting for survival on the bottom line. 2) Getting Attached to Something that Isn’t Working Another common pitfall I’ve seen repeatedly is when business owners are wedded to a product, service, or strategy that is unsuccessful. Instead of bringing in revenue, it is harming their business’s financial health. Passionate and committed entrepreneurs often take on the idea that they can make something work – even if it’s not meant to be and falsely believe that admitting defeat or giving in to the notion that if a product, service, or strategy goes away means they have failed. It’s also hard because they have almost always dedicated so many resources to their efforts that they must continue trying. However, a small business has many advantages over a large, bureaucratic entity. One advantage is flexibility. They can move quickly to take advantage of opportunities or pivot away from unsuccessful undertakings (like poorly performing products, services, or strategies) before too much financial damage is inflicted on the business. The damage is generally manifested as negative cash flows or declining profits. Still, the effects are much more far-reaching and less clear, but they impact the most finite of resources, time, and energy. I recommend having a timeline and specific goals to chart the progress of a new product or service. Then, your company has guidelines that can prevent devoting unwarranted time, money, and energy to unsuccessful projects. There is no shame in experimenting and adapting your business and acknowledging that some ideas failed. You are still doing a great job and learning with every experience, becoming more substantial and more valuable in the marketplace.
First, I am indifferent to following celebrity relationships. Yet, I root for high-profile people and all people to find happiness and contentment. Still, exploring the economics of public relationships related to pro football is intriguing. For context, I am a lifelong, long-suffering Miami Dolphins fan (since 1970), so another resounding defeat to end the season is painful but not unexpected. The latest defeat was at the hands of the Chiefs in frigid Kansas City. The media furor started in September. After a win from the Kansas City Chiefs, where Taylor Swift was present, cheering on her boyfriend, Travis Kelce , it inspired me to analyze the logistics and economic impact of this very public relationship. Not only are we looking at how Taylor can find the time to travel from wherever she is on her world tour to wherever Kelce is during a game, or how Kelce can find a few days to escape his training before his next game to go to wherever Taylor is, I’m looking at the finances of this relationship. When it comes to Relationship Math, there are many formulas we can use. Let’s start with how much it costs for two celebrities to fall in love while everyone is watching. As might be expected with any high-profile romance where the literal world is watching, Front Office Sports confirmed some spectacular math was at play when they posted on Twitter that since Taylor first showed up to Kelce’s September 24, 2023, Chiefs-Bears game, there was a: 400% spike in Travis Kelce jersey sales Kelce’s jersey sales moved from the 19th most popular to the 5th most popular Kelce's podcast with his brother ranks #1 overall on Apple Kelce adds 383K Instagram followers 24.3M viewers watched, making it the #1 game of the week 63% jump in female viewers aged 18-49 3x increase in 'Chiefs' searches on the web 3x increase in Chiefs sales on StubHub Chiefs sold more tickets in a single day since the start of the season The statistics are noteworthy, but was the spike in jersey sales sticky? For all of 2023, Kelce had the 9th best-selling jersey, so it seems the spike had staying power. I’m not going to devote much time to researching and breaking down every cost, but it was enlightening to show these numbers to illustrate the grand scale of this situation. I want to break down something that’s not on the list: the cost of jet fuel. For the sake of simplicity, let’s examine one of Taylor’s flights. Countless sources talk about Taylor’s two jets - the Dassault Falcon 7x and the Dassault Falcon 900- which cost $40 million. According to Newscenter Maine, “the Dassault Falcon 7x jet flew from London to Bangor, using about 2,382 gallons of fuel amounting to about $13,300.” The outlet reported that the stopover was the first of her U.S. return, which took off to fly to Kansas City. From Heathrow to Bangor, it’s 3,068 miles, so that’s $4.34 a mile. Bangor to Kansas City is 1,736 miles, which would cost $7,534. Combined from the UK to Maine to Kansas City, that’s around $20,834. This September 2023 Variety magazine says: “After the pop star caused a media frenzy on Sunday when she was spotted cheering on Travis Kelce amid dating rumors, jersey sales for the Chiefs tight end reportedly spiked by nearly 400%.” On NFLshop.com , the jersey goes for $129.99, so while I don’t know how many were selling pre-Taylor, let’s say, for the sake of simplicity, that there were 50,000 Kelce jerseys sold between January 1 and September 23, 2023. That translates to $12,999,000 or about $24,434 per day. A 400% spike in sales would be $122,171 per day or an increase of $98K daily or almost $3M monthly. Daily jersey sales would increase from 188 to 940 per day. So, we’re already up to $120K in economic impact between two flights from the UK to Kansas City and a 400% spike in jerseys in one day. My final calculation: High-profile love is expensive, and Zoom seems to be a highly underutilized resource in this scenario. Photo credit: AP/ED ZURGA
